Interesting fact: Did you know that for divorce lawyers, the busiest time of year for picking up new clients is January and February? Studies also show that people in dating or live-in relationships also tend to go splitsville during those same two months. But as divorce rates taper off heading into the end of the school year, another kind of breaking-up picks up steam: The executive kind. Enter the busy season for digital marketing hiring.
There’s more than just pollen in the air when Spring rolls around. It’s also transition season. Looking back on 28 years of experience in executive search, one trend definitely stands out: The second quarter is almost always the busiest when it comes to digital marketing hiring. By March and April, most prior year bonuses have been paid and the school year ends in only a couple of months, roughly coinciding with the typical length of an executive level search. Prospective candidates dreaming about greener pastures start getting serious, and more resumes means a greater selection of amazing talent.
If you’re a CEO, this all means one thing: This is THE time to start the recruiting process to fill that key marketing position. Digital marketing hiring is in full gear!
If you haven’t been in the market for a seasoned marketing executive lately, a couple of important things to keep in mind:
-Always be selling. I remember one CEO telling me, “Why should I spend my time selling my company? The candidates are the ones who should be doing the selling.” That’s misguided thinking. You’re not the only one with a great story to tell. It’s been my experience that juggling candidates is a bit like handicapping race horses: The closer the horse is to the front of the pack after that first quarter mile, the greater the odds that horse will win. It’s the rare candidate who tells me, “You know, I’m looking at four possibilities, and they’re all so great I can’t really rank them.” Compelling stories, told early and with conviction, can make a big difference in how a candidate sizes up your opportunity.
-Prepare to do some extreme vetting, and don’t depend on your recruiter to do it for you. I happen to think that I conduct pretty good references, but can I talk peer-to-peer with another hiring manager like a CEO can? Definitely not. Fact is, it is harder for me as the recruiter, who stands to benefit if my candidate is hired, to mentally eliminate someone who I have spent many hours identifying, evaluating, qualifying and presenting, because of a less than stellar reference. Further, headhunters tend to work off pre-formulated reference forms. I am simply not going to ask questions with the same nuances as someone who runs and operates the business day-to-day. I believe conducting reference checks should be akin to conducting a deposition: A non-linear approach where one question leads to another, which in turn leads to another and then another, covering a broad swath of competencies until you start to get a clearer picture of the candidate’s capabilities within the context of your organization’s culture and management philosophy. And that can only be done by the decision maker who has a significant stake in the outcome.